Doe v. Crane et al
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Dennis Crane, Robert Sterner, Chris Koster and James Keathley
Case Number: 2:2009cv04220
Filed: October 23, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Jefferson City Office
County: Callaway
Presiding Judge: Nanette K. Laughrey
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. Plaintiff Doe's Motion for Attorney Fees [Doc. # 46] is GRANTED. The Court awards in favor of Doe and against Defendants $2,512.50 in attorney fees, plus $350 in other costs, for a total of $2,862.50.(Kanies, Renea)
May 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. The Moving Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 30] is GRANTED.Because the case is moot, the Court does not reach Doe's motion for summary judgment. (Kanies, Renea)
October 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. Defendant's Motion to Stay Proceedings [Doc. # 12] is GRANTED: this matter is stayed on the merits pending resolution of the state law issue by the Missouri Supreme Court. It is further ORDERED that Plai ntiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [Doc. # 5] is GRANTED IN PART: Plaintiff shall identify himself in a sealed filing with this Court; within four hours of Plaintiff doing so, Defendants and all persons acting in connection with them , other than the Attorney General, are enjoined from enforcing, threatening to enforce, prosecuting, or continuing to prosecute alleged violations of Section 589.426 against Plaintiff; Defendants may reveal Plaintiff's identity to law enforcement officials as necessary to comply with this Order; bond is waived. (Kanies, Renea)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Crane et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe
Represented By: Anthony E. Rothert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dennis Crane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Sterner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chris Koster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Keathley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?