Padberg v. DISH NETWORK LLC et al
| Mike Padberg |
| DISH NETWORK LLC |
| 2:2011cv04035 |
| January 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Jefferson City Office |
| Cole |
| Nanette K. Laughrey |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
497
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. In light of Plaintiff's motion for award of attorneys' fees, expenses, and class representative incentive award, Doc. 495 , the Court will reopen the case. Plaintiff's motion is granted. Signed on 4/30/18 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Matthes Mitra, Renea)
|
|
Filing
409
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. DISH's Motion for Reconsideration and Request for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal, 402 , is denied. (Cross, Ashley)
|
|
Filing
233
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. DISH Network's Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery, 223 , is DENIED. (Cross, Ashley)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. Defendant Dish Network's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to Counts I, II and VII, and GRANTED as to Counts III, IV, V and VI. (Re 18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Dish Network LLC ) (Kanies, Renea)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. DISH's Motion to Transfer Venue [Doc. # 11] is DENIED.(Kanies, Renea)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
