Santana v. ProEnergy Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Heather Santana
Defendant: ProEnergy Services, LLC
Case Number: 2:2011cv04059
Filed: February 22, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Jefferson City Office
County: Pettis
Presiding Judge: Nanette K. Laughrey
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. Santana's motion to strike [Doc. # 17] is DENIED, and ProEnergy's motion to compel arbitration [Doc. # 10] is GRANTED. The Court stays these proceedings pending the arbitration. (Kanies, Renea)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Santana v. ProEnergy Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ProEnergy Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heather Santana
Represented By: Marie L. Gockel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?