Simpkins v. Iowa 80 Group, Inc.

Simpkins v. Iowa 80 Group, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Carlton Simpkins
Defendant:	Iowa 80 Group, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2015cv04295
Filed:	December 23, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office:	Jefferson City Office
County:	Cole
Presiding Judge:	Nanette K. Laughrey
Nature of Suit:	Consumer Credit
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 26, 2017	Filing 35 ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. The parties' joint motion, Doc. 33 , is granted on the condition that: (1) The settlement checks will be good for 180 days rather than the 90 days provided in Paragraphs 4 and 5 in Doc. 33-2, p. 10; and (2) The last sentence of Paragraph 5 "Residual Funds" is replaced with the following: The parties shall report to the Court the sum of all checks that are undeliverable after one skip trace for the Court to make a final determination rega rding whether a second distribution of the settlement to the located plaintiffs is feasible. If the Court determines that a second distribution is not feasible, the settlement funds remaining due to undelivered checks will be distributed to the part ies' identified cy pres recipient, Goodwill Industries International, Inc.; and (3) The Notice document's "Do Nothing" box within the "Summary of Your Rights and Options" box, Doc. 33-3, p. 1, is edited to replace the likely typo "bout" with "bound," so that it reads, "You will be bound by judgments and orders..." This entry was modified on 1/26/2017 to reflect that a document is attached. (Specker, Suzanne).

Date Filed

Document Text

January 26, 2017

Filing 35 ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. The parties' joint motion, Doc. 33 , is granted on the condition that: (1) The settlement checks will be good for 180 days rather than the 90 days provided in Paragraphs 4 and 5 in Doc. 33-2, p. 10; and (2) The last sentence of Paragraph 5 "Residual Funds" is replaced with the following: The parties shall report to the Court the sum of all checks that are undeliverable after one skip trace for the Court to make a final determination rega rding whether a second distribution of the settlement to the located plaintiffs is feasible. If the Court determines that a second distribution is not feasible, the settlement funds remaining due to undelivered checks will be distributed to the part ies' identified cy pres recipient, Goodwill Industries International, Inc.; and (3) The Notice document's "Do Nothing" box within the "Summary of Your Rights and Options" box, Doc. 33-3, p. 1, is edited to replace the likely typo "bout" with "bound," so that it reads, "You will be bound by judgments and orders..." This entry was modified on 1/26/2017 to reflect that a document is attached. (Specker, Suzanne).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Simpkins v. Iowa 80 Group, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlton Simpkins
Represented By:	Charles Jason Brown
Represented By:	Jayson A. Watkins
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Iowa 80 Group, Inc.
Represented By:	Mitchell E. Wood
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?