Foor v. Citi Mortgage Inc. et al
| Sydney Foor |
| Citi Mortgage Inc., Stonegate Mortgage and Martin Leigh Law Firm |
| 2:2015cv04296 |
| December 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Jefferson City Office |
| Camden |
| M. Douglas Harpool |
| Foreclosure |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER GRANTING re 18 MOTION to dismiss party filed by Progressive Casualty Ins Co, GRANTING 27 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Citi Mortgage Inc., GRANTING 26 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by MO State Attorney Ge, GRANTING 39 MOTION to dismiss party filed by Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc., DENYING 37 MOTION to consolidate cases MOTION for order to Transfer filed by Sydney Foor, DENYING 44 MOTION to consolidate cases MOTION to seal document, MOTION to consolidate cases MOTION for order to Transfer filed by Sydney Foor, Sydney Marie Foor, DENYING AS MOOT 8 MOTION for temporary restraining order filed by Sydne y Foor, DENYING 35 MOTION to appoint counsel filed by Sydney Foor, DENYING 53 MOTION to consolidate cases filed by Sydney Foor. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed, in their entirety, against all the Defendants. Signed on 10/3/16 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (View, Pat) Modified on 10/3/2016 (View, Pat). Copy of Order mailed to Plaintiff.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
