IM Boone, LLC v. Randolph E. Adams, both individually and in his capacity as co-trustee et al
Plaintiff: IM Boone, LLC
Defendant: Randolph E. Adams, both individually and in his capacity as co-trustee, Carolyn J. Adams, both individually and in her capacity as co-trustee, Chad E. Adams, both individually and in his capacity as co-trustee, Carmen Adams, both individually and in her capacity as co-trustee and RACA Properties, LLC
Case Number: 2:2016cv04177
Filed: June 21, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Jefferson City Office
County: Boone
Presiding Judge: Matt J. Whitworth
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 51 The Court DENIES the motion to quash filed by GPT (Doc. 33 ) and ORDERS GPT to provide to Plaintiff's counsel the documents and information requested in the subpoena within five days of this order or, if a motion for a protective order is to be filed, within five days of the Court's entry of an order concerning the motion for a protective order. (Sreeprakash, Netra)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: IM Boone, LLC v. Randolph E. Adams, both individually and in his capacity as co-trustee et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: IM Boone, LLC
Represented By: Bradley Robert Gardner
Represented By: Aaron C. Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randolph E. Adams, both individually and in his capacity as co-trustee
Represented By: Danieal H Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn J. Adams, both individually and in her capacity as co-trustee
Represented By: Danieal H Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chad E. Adams, both individually and in his capacity as co-trustee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carmen Adams, both individually and in her capacity as co-trustee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RACA Properties, LLC
Represented By: Danieal H Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?