Brown et al v. Precythe et al
| Norman Brown, Ralph McElroy, Sidney Roberts and Theron Roland |
| Anne L. Precythe, Kenneth Jones, Jim Wells, Martin Rucker, Ellis McSwain, Jr, Don Ruzicka, Jennifer Zamkus and Gary Dusenberg |
| 2:2017cv04082 |
| May 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Jefferson City Office |
| Cole |
| Nanette K. Laughrey |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
230
CLERK'S JUDGMENT (Lock, Tania)
|
|
Filing
204
ORDER by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. granting in part Plaintiffs' motion for fees and expenses (Doc. 187 ). The Court awards to Plaintiffs' counsel a total of $433,255.39 in fees and $35,374.45 in costs.(Sreeprakash, Netra)
|
|
Filing
184
CLERK'S JUDGMENT (Matthes Mitra, Renea)
|
|
Filing
158
ORDER (REDACTED) by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. The parties' motions for summary judgment, Docs. 133 and 137 , are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (Sreeprakash, Netra)
|
|
Filing
140
ORDER by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. Plaintiffs' motion for class certification, Doc. 103 , is GRANTED (Sreeprakash, Netra)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. The Court denies without prejudice Defendants' motion to strike Plaintiffs' designation of Professor Rummel as an expert and Professor Rummel's report (Doc. 110 ). The Court will resolve Daubert issues in the course of deciding the case. (Sreeprakash, Netra)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. Plaintiffs' motion for discovery (Doc. 122 ) is denied. (Sreeprakash, Netra)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. Defendants' motion to dismiss, Doc. 23 , is denied, and Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend, Doc. 48 , is granted. Plaintiffs must file the amended complaint within 5 days of the entry of this order . The Court orders Defendants to produce to Plaintiffs, within 10 days of entry of this order, all of the following documents and information: (1) recordings of Plaintiffs' parole hearings; (2) Plaintiffs' parole files, including notes an d memoranda created by the Board or parole staff; and (3) information regarding who participated in Plaintiffs' parole hearings and parole-related decisions, and in what capacity. Further, the Court orders Defendants to provide to the Court for in camera inspection, within 10 days of entry of this order, an unredacted copy of the Inspector General's Investigation Report. If the Court determines that Plaintiffs are entitled to review any portion of that report that has been redacted, the Court will notify the parties and permit Defendants an opportunity to designate the document as appropriate in accordance with the protective order.(Sreeprakash, Netra)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
