Gasca, et al v. Precythe, et al
| Stephanie Gasca, Mildred Curren, Kenneth Hemphill, Jesse Neely, Amber Wyse and Timothy Gallagher |
| Anne L. Precythe, Kenneth Jones, Jennifer Zamkus, Jim Wells, Martin Rucker, Ellis McSwain, Jr, Don Ruzicka and Gary Dusenberg |
| 2:2017cv04149 |
| August 14, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Jefferson City Office |
| Cole |
| Stephen R. Bough |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
323
ORDER on Remedy. Signed on 11/12/2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A: Notice of Rights, # 2 Exhibit B: Preliminary Hearing Form, # 3 Exhibit C: Revocation Hearing Form, # 4 Exhibit D: Screening Instrument) (Richard, Tracey).
|
|
Filing
168
ORDERED: Mr. Garretts pro se motion to intervene (Doc. #159) is DENIED. Signed on 6/28/19 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. Copy of this order mailed to: Mason Garrett, Pulaski Co. Jail, 301 Historic 66 E., Suite 136, Waynesville, MO 65583. (Diefenbach, Tracy)
|
|
Filing
146
ORDER granting 129 motion for summary judgment. Signed on 2/27/19 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Diefenbach, Tracy)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDERED Plaintiffs Renewed Motion for Class Certification (Doc. #111) is GRANTED. Signed on 1/4/19 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Diefenbach, Tracy)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
