Downey et al v. Department of Justice-Attorney General et al
Major League Baseball Players Association, NFL, US Attorney-Department of Justice, National Hockey League, NHL Players' Association, Department of Justice-Attorney General, National Assn of Government Labor Officials, Major League Baseball, National Basketball Players Association, NBA and National Football League Players Association |
Mark Downey, United States of America and Estate of Virginia Downey |
2:2019cv04140 |
July 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Brian C Wimes |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 ORDERED Plaintiff is granted leave to file a proposed amended complaint on or before September 18, 2019. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis remains under advisement. Copy of order mailed to pro se party this date as directed in order. Signed on 8/28/19 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Baldwin, Joella) |
Filing 1 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Mark Downey. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/22/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)(Lock, Tania) Modified on 7/17/2019 to reflect that a copy of the NEF was mailed to plaintiff Mark Downey (Lock, Tania). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.