Hamilton v. Morgan County, Missouri et al
| Revious Leon Hamilton, Jr |
| Peggy Richardson, Office of Prosecuting Attorney, Morgan County, Missouri, Dustin G Dunklee and Grantham |
| 2:2020cv04076 |
| May 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Bough |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER that Plaintiff's post-judgment motion was filed less than 28 days from judgment. The motion restates arguments previously considered and rejected by this Court or otherwise does not comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court's Local Rules. After careful review of the original order denying relief, the motion at bar, and the record as a whole, the Court finds that Plaintiff is not entitled to relief. Plaintiff's post-judgement motion (Doc. #12 ) is denied. Further, the agency having custody of Plaintiff forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $350 filing fee is paid. Signed on June 26, 2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 12 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for reconsideration filed by Revious Leon Hamilton, Jr. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/25/2020. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 11 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Willis, Kathy) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed on 06/01/2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| RECEIPT number KCMO084470 in the amount of $100.00 issued to Kurtis Rasco for Revious Leon Hamilton, Jr. (Melvin, Greg) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to pay his initial fee. Fee now due on or before 6/5/2020. Signed on 05/26/2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 8 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for extension of time to pay initial partial filing fee filed by Revious Leon Hamilton, Jr. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/9/2020. (Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, Western Division, an initial partial filing fee of $61.07; and (3) Plaintiff's failure to pay the required initial partial filing fee on or before May 29, 2020, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 05/14/2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 6 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Revious Leon Hamilton, Jr. (Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff has not demonstrated that the Court should appoint counsel. Plaintiff's case is still subject to pre-service dismissal. This motion is denied without prejudice. Signed on 05/11/2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 3 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Revious Leon Hamilton, Jr. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/22/2020. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Revious Leon Hamilton, Jr. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Revious Leon Hamilton, Jr. (Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
