Lewis v. Ramey
| Casey D. Lewis |
| Eileen Ramey |
| 2:2020cv04180 |
| September 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Nanette K Laughrey |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER that Petitioner's motion for extension of time (Doc. #10 ) is DENIED without prejudice for Petitioner's failure to comply with the Court's previous order. Signed on 11/04/2020 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 10 PETITIONER'S MOTION for extension of time to file response to Order of October 2, 2020 (Doc. #7 ), filed by Casey D. Lewis. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: This case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Order. (Willis, Kathy) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: ORDERED that this case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Order. Any motion to reopen this case must be filed within a reasonable period of time, and must comply with the Court's previous Order. Signed on 10/23/2020 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Willis, Kathy)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: ORDERED that Petitioner show cause why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Order on or before October 16, 2020. Failure to timely respond will result in the dismissal of this case. Signed on October 2, 2020 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Davies, Cindy)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER that Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. #3 ) is denied without prejudice, because it does not yet appear that an evidentiary hearing is required in this matter or that appointment of counsel is required for the fair presentation of Petitioner's claims. See Hoggard v. Purkett, 29 F.3d 469, 471 (8th Cir. 1994) (Where an evidentiary hearing is not required, the district court retains discretion to determine whether counsel should be appointed.). Signed on October 2, 2020 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| RECEIPT number KCMO086436 in the amount of $5.00 issued to Casey Lewis. (Kern, Kendra) |
|
Filing 5
ORDERED that: (1) petitioner is directed to correct the above-listed technical defects in this petition on or before September 30, 2020; (2) the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail petitioner a copy of this Order along with court-approved forms; and (3) FAILURE OF PETITIONER TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER WARNING TO PETITIONER. Signed on September 15, 2020 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Casey D. Lewis. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/24/2020.(Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Casey D. Lewis. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Casey D. Lewis (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Willis, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lewis v. Ramey | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Casey D. Lewis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Eileen Ramey | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
