Cassidy v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
Allen Paul Cassidy |
Thompson, Endsley, Craig, Missouri Department of Corrections and Morris |
2:2020cv04250 |
December 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Nanette K Laughrey |
Prisoner Pro Se |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 10 NOTICE of change of address filed by Allen Paul Cassidy. New address is Northeast Correctional Center, 13698 Airport Rd, Bowling Green, MO 63334. (Davies, Cindy) |
***Remark: Per staff at Tipton Correctional Center, plaintiff transferred to Northeast Correctional Center yesterday. Address in CM/ECF updated and copy of docket sheet with text order of 1/14/21 highlighted mailed to plaintiff to new address. (Davies, Cindy) |
|
|
Filing 7 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Allen Paul Cassidy. (Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 4 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Allen Paul Cassidy. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/5/2021. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 3 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Allen Paul Cassidy. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Allen Paul Cassidy. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Allen Paul Cassidy. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.