Kelly v. State of Missouri
| Courtneysheree Kelly |
| State of Missouri |
| 2:2020cv04259 |
| December 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Brian C Wimes |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER that Petitioner file a reply to the State's response (Doc. 9) by March 15, 2021. Signed on February 26, 2021, by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (McCoy, Mike)
|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by State of Missouri. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (docket entries), #2 Exhibit B (sentence and judgment), #3 Exhibit C (probation violation report), #4 Exhibit D (probation discharge order))(Crane, Andrew) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of appearance by Andrew J Crane on behalf of State of Missouri (Attorney Andrew J Crane added to party State of Missouri(pty:res))(Crane, Andrew) (Main Document 8 replaced on 2/1/2021) (Houston, Kiambu). |
|
Filing 7
ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) Respondent answer Petitioner's allegations and show cause on or before February 25, 2021, why the relief Petitioner seeks should not be granted. Signed on 1/25/2021 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 6 PETITIONER'S IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Courtneysheree Kelly. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 5 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus on court-approved forms as directed by 1/4/21 order (Doc. #4 ) filed by Courtneysheree Kelly.(Davies, Cindy) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) petitioner is directed to correct the technical defects in this petition on or before January 19, 2021; (2) the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail petitioner a copy of this Order along with court-approved forms to prepare the petition; and (3) FAILURE OF PETITIONER TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER WARNING TO PETITIONER. Signed on 1/4/2021 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (CLERK'S NOTE: A copy of this Order and court-approved forms mailed to Petitioner as directed.) (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Courtneysheree Kelly. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Courtneysheree Kelly.(Willis, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kelly v. State of Missouri | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Courtneysheree Kelly | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: State of Missouri | |
| Represented By: | Andrew J Crane |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
