Boyd v. Ramey
Petitioner: Eddie A Boyd
Respondent: Eileen Ramey and Doris Falkenrath
Case Number: 2:2021cv04072
Filed: April 5, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Nanette K Laughrey
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE (SEALED) by Doris Falkenrath re 13 Order on Motion for Leave to File, Exhibits Under Seal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Trial and Sentencing Transcript Unredacted, #2 Exhibit B Boyd's Direct Appeal Brief and Appendix Unredacted, #3 Exhibit C State's Direct Appeal Brief and Appendix Unredacted, #4 Exhibit D Direct Appeal Legal File Unredacted, #5 Exhibit E Direct Appeal Order and Memorandum Unredacted, #6 Exhibit F Application for Transfer Unredacted, #7 Exhibit H PCR Transcript Unredacted, #8 Exhibit I Boyd's PCR Appeal Brief Unredacted, #9 Exhibit J State's PCR Appeal Brief Unredacted, #10 Exhibit K Boyd's PCR Appeal Reply Brief Unredacted, #11 Exhibit L PCR Appeal Legal File Unredacted)(Clarke, Andrew)
May 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Respondent's motion to file exhibits under seal, and directing Petitioner to file a reply to the State's response (Doc. 11) by June 14, 2021. Signed on May 13, 2021, by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (McCoy, Mike)
May 12, 2021 Filing 12 MOTION for leave to file Exhibits Under Seal filed by Andrew Clarke on behalf of Doris Falkenrath. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/26/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attorney Andrew Clarke added to party Doris Falkenrath(pty:res))(Clarke, Andrew)
May 12, 2021 Filing 11 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Doris Falkenrath. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Trial and Sentencing Transcript (Part 1), #2 Exhibit A Trial and Sentencing Transcript (Part 2), #3 Exhibit B Boyd's Direct Appeal Brief and Appendix, #4 Exhibit C State's Direct Appeal Brief and Appendix, #5 Exhibit D Direct Appeal Legal File, #6 Exhibit E Direct Appeal Order and Memorandum, #7 Exhibit F Application for Transfer, #8 Exhibit G Order Denying Application for Transfer, #9 Exhibit H PCR Transcript, #10 Exhibit I Boyd's PCR Appeal Brief, #11 Exhibit J State's PCR Appeal Brief, #12 Exhibit K Boyd's PCR Appeal Reply Brief, #13 Exhibit L PCR Appeal Legal File, #14 Exhibit M Modified PCR Order and Memorandum, #15 Exhibit N PCR Mandate)(Clarke, Andrew)
May 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting motion to substitute party (Doc. ]9]). Doris Falkenrath (Warden) added and Eileen Ramey (Warden) terminated.Signed on 5/12/2021 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
May 12, 2021 Filing 9 MOTION to substitute party Warden Eileen Ramey filed by Andrew Clarke on behalf of Eileen Ramey. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/26/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Clarke, Andrew)
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER denying without prejudice #7 Petitioners motion for appointed counsel. See Hoggard v. Purkett, 29 F.3d 469, 471 (8th Cir. 1994) (no constitutional right to counsel in a federal habeas corpus case; criteria for appointment). Signed on April 30, 2021, by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (McCoy, Mike)
April 30, 2021 Filing 7 PETITIONER'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Eddie A Boyd. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibits)(Willis, Kathy)
April 21, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of appearance by Andrew Clarke on behalf of Eileen Ramey (Attorney Andrew Clarke added to party Eileen Ramey(pty:res))(Clarke, Andrew)
April 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) Respondent answer Petitioner's allegations and show cause on or before May 12, 2021, why the relief Petitioner seeks should not be granted. Signed on 4/12/2021 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
April 5, 2021 Filing 3 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Eddie A Boyd. (Willis, Kathy)
April 5, 2021 Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Eddie A Boyd. (Willis, Kathy)
April 5, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Eddie A Boyd.(Willis, Kathy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyd v. Ramey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Eileen Ramey
Represented By: Andrew Clarke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Doris Falkenrath
Represented By: Andrew Clarke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Eddie A Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?