Brown v. Quintana et al
Plaintiff: Jeremiah E Brown
Defendant: Thomas Quintana and Johnathon D Logan
Case Number: 2:2021cv04152
Filed: August 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen R Bough
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2021 Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED that this case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Orders. Any motion to reopen must be filed within a reasonable time and must be accompanied by either the filing and administrative fees totaling $402 or a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, as previously ordered. (Davies, Cindy)
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: ORDERED that this case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Orders. Any motion to reopen must be filed within a reasonable time and must be accompanied by either the filing and administrative fees totaling $402 or a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, as previously ordered. Signed on September 7, 2021 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Davies, Cindy)
September 2, 2021 Filing 4 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Jeremiah E Brown. (Davies, Cindy)
August 19, 2021 MAIL RETURNED as undeliverable; marked "return to sender - not deliverable as addressed." Mail sent to Jeremiah E Brown. (Related documents: new case letter and #3 ) (Davies, Cindy)
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDERED that: (1) plaintiff is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a); (2) plaintiff is directed to correct the technical defects in this complaint on or before August 25, 2021; (3) the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail plaintiff a copy of this Order along with court-approved in forma pauperis forms; and (4) FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF. Signed on 8/10/2021 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (CLERK'S NOTE: A copy of this Order along with court-approved in forma pauperis forms mailed to Plaintiff as directed.) (Willis, Kathy)
August 9, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jeremiah E Brown. (Willis, Kathy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Quintana et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeremiah E Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Quintana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnathon D Logan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?