Hill v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
| Demetris Hill |
| T-Mobile USA, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv04164 |
| August 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Nanette K Laughrey |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey granting #13 Consent Motion to Stay. The Court hereby STAYS all proceedings and deadlines in this matter pending action by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Defendant's #11 Motion to Stay is denied as moot. Signed on 10/5/2021 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Gassen, Austin)
|
| Filing 13 Joint MOTION to stay pending action by Judicial Panel on MultiDistrict Litigation filed by Michael W Seitz on behalf of T-Mobile USA, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/18/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Seitz, Michael) |
| Filing 12 SUGGESTIONS in support re #11 MOTION to stay pending action by Judicial Panel on MultiDistrict Litigation filed by Michael W Seitz on behalf of Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.. (Related document(s) #11 ) (Seitz, Michael) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to stay pending action by Judicial Panel on MultiDistrict Litigation filed by Michael W Seitz on behalf of T-Mobile USA, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/7/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Seitz, Michael) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. Defendant's consent motion for extension of time, Doc. #8 , is granted. Defendant's response to the Complaint, Doc. #1 , must be filed on or before October 18, 2021. Signed on 9/9/2021 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Gassen, Austin)
|
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Michael W Seitz on behalf of Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc..(Seitz, Michael) |
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for extension of time to file answer filed by Michael W Seitz on behalf of T-Mobile USA, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/23/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attorney Michael W Seitz added to party T-Mobile USA, Inc.(pty:dft))(Seitz, Michael) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 motion to appear pro hac vice entered by Clerk of Court. Attorney William B. Federman for Demetris Hill allowed to appear pro hac vice. This entry will serve as authorization for the pro hac participation by the attorney. Western District of Missouri Local Rule 5.1 requires documents to be filed electronically. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for a WDMO e-filing account for NextGen CM/ECF. This will enable counsel to electronically file documents and receive electronic notification of filings. Register for a WDMO e-filing account at #PACER. Signed on 8/28/2021 by Clerk of Court. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Moore, Terri)
|
| Filing 6 Motion to allow William B. Federman to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-7557163) filed by Maureen M. Brady on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(Brady, Maureen) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER ON PRETRIAL PROCEDURES. Service must be obtained on all defendants within forty (40) days of the date of this Order unless otherwise authorized by the Court. Signed on 08/26/2021 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Lock, Tania)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Berner, Crystal) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of appearance by Lucy McShane on behalf of Demetris Hill (Brady, Maureen). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of appearance by Maureen Brady on behalf of Demetris Hill (Brady, Maureen). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Maureen M. Brady on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7553965. Service due by 11/23/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brady, Maureen) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/25/2021) (Berner, Crystal). Modified on 8/25/2021 with correct civil cover sheet provided by counsel (Berner, Crystal). |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to T-Mobile USA, Inc. (Crocker, Susan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hill v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Demetris Hill | |
| Represented By: | Lucy McShane |
| Represented By: | Maureen M. Brady |
| Represented By: | William B. Federman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael W Seitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
