Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Long et al
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company |
John W. Long, Roy S Paxton, Earl D. Paxton, Cozetta Chalfaunt, Tammy Henderson and Shane Colin |
2:2021cv04179 |
September 20, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
M Douglas Harpool |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Brette S. Hart on behalf of Plaintiff Progressive Casualty Insurance Company.(Hart, Brette) |
NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP) |
Filing 10 RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 12/17/2021. Rule 26 conference due by 12/1/2021. Signed on 10/25/21 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (View, Pat) |
Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE unexecuted on 09/28/2021 as to John W. Long (Hart, Brette) Modified on 10/25/2021 to correct event type. (Berner, Crystal) |
Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE unexecuted on 09/28/2021 as to Tammy Henderson.(Hart, Brette) Modified on 10/25/2021 to correct event type (Berner, Crystal). |
Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. Shane Colin served on 10/5/2021, answer due 10/26/2021. (Hart, Brette) |
Filing 6 Defendants Roy S. Paxton, Earl D. Paxton and Cozetta Chalfaunt's ANSWER to #1 Complaint, for Declaratory Judgment on behalf of Cozetta Chalfaunt, Earl D. Paxton, Roy S Paxton.(Attorney Andrew Jay Gelbach added to party Cozetta Chalfaunt(pty:dft), Attorney Andrew Jay Gelbach added to party Earl D. Paxton(pty:dft), Attorney Andrew Jay Gelbach added to party Roy S Paxton(pty:dft))(Gelbach, Andrew) |
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. Earl D. Paxton served on September 22, 2021. Answer due by 10/13/2021. (Greenberg, Matthew) Modified on 9/30/2021 to correct event type, set deadlines. NEF regenerated (Berner, Crystal). |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. Roy S. Paxton served on September 22, 2021. Answer due by 10/13/2021. (Greenberg, Matthew) Modified on 9/30/2021 to correct event type, set deadlines. NEF regenerated (Berner, Crystal). |
Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. Cozetta Chalfaunt served on September 22, 2021. Answer due by 10/13/2021. (Greenberg, Matthew) Modified on 9/30/2021 to correct event type, set deadlines. NEF regenerated (Berner, Crystal). |
Answer for Cozetta Chalfaunt, Roy S. Paxton and Earl D. Paxton due 10/13/2021. (Berner, Crystal) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Cozetta Chalfaunt, Shane Colin, Tammy Henderson, John W. Long, Earl D. Paxton, Roy S Paxton. (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Warren, Melissa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Brette S. Hart on behalf of Progressive Casualty Insurance Company - OH. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7591316. Service due by 12/20/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hart, Brette) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.