Foerster v. Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company
Plaintiff: Michelle Foerster
Defendant: Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company
Case Number: 2:2021cv04229
Filed: December 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: M Douglas Harpool
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #9 MOTION to remand filed by Matthew B Uhrig on behalf of Plaintiff Michelle Foerster. (Related document(s) #9 ) (Uhrig, Matthew)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 DESIGNATION OF MEDIATOR naming William H. Sanders(Armstrong, Blake)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 RULES OF TRIAL. Signed on 1/28/22 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (View, Pat)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 SCHEDULING AND JURY TRIAL ORDER:( Initial Pretrial Conference set for 7/27/2023 01:00 PM Courtroom 4B, Jefferson City (VDJJC) before District Judge M. Douglas Harpool., Jury Trial set for five days beginning 8/7/2023 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4B, Jefferson City (VDJJC) before District Judge M. Douglas Harpool., Dispositive Motions due by 12/9/2022., Initial Pretrial Conference set for 8/7/2023 08:30 AM Courtroom 4B, Jefferson City (VDJJC) before District Judge M. Douglas Harpool.), ( Amended Pleadings due by 2/1/2022., Joinder of Parties due by 2/1/2022., Discovery Motions due by 11/3/2022., Status Reports due by 5/4/2022.; 8/4/2022 and 11/4/2022) Discovery due by 11/18/2022. Signed on 1/28/22 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (View, Pat)
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ANSWER to #16 Amended Complaint on behalf of Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company.(Armstrong, Blake)
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Joint PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company. (Armstrong, Blake)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #9 MOTION to remand filed by Blake Armstrong on behalf of Defendant Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company. Reply suggestions due by 2/1/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #9 ) (Armstrong, Blake)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Matthew B Uhrig on behalf of All Plaintiffs.(Uhrig, Matthew)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 NOTICE of appearance by Blake Armstrong on behalf of Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company (Attorney Blake Armstrong added to party Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company(pty:dft))(Armstrong, Blake)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #8 motion for leave to file. Plaintiff is ordered to file the Amended Complaint within 7 days of this order. Answer to the Amended Complaint is due 14 days after the Amended Complaint is filed. Signed on 1/13/2022 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Maerz, Mary)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 RESPONSE to motion re #8 MOTION for leave to file Amended Complaint filed by Robert J. Tomaso on behalf of Defendant Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company. Reply suggestions due by 1/25/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Tomaso, Robert)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER finding as moot #10 motion to clarify; granting #11 motion to clarify. Suggestions in opposition to the motion to remand are due on or before 1/17/2022. Signed on 1/4/2022 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Maerz, Mary) Modified on 1/4/2022 (Maerz, Mary).
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Amended MOTION to clarify Deadline for Suggestions in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Robert J. Tomaso on behalf of Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/18/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Foerster's Original Motion to Remand)(Tomaso, Robert)
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION to clarify Deadline for Suggestions in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Robert J. Tomaso on behalf of Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/18/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Foerster's Original Motion to Remand))(Tomaso, Robert)
December 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION to remand filed by Matthew B Uhrig on behalf of Michelle Foerster. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/11/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Uhrig, Matthew) (Main Document 9 replaced on 12/29/2021 to include signature block) (Warren, Melissa).
December 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for leave to file Amended Complaint filed by Matthew B Uhrig on behalf of Michelle Foerster. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/11/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 First Amended Complaint)(Uhrig, Matthew)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint on behalf of Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company.(Tomaso, Robert)
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP)
December 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 1/31/2022. Rule 26 conference due by 1/14/2022. Signed on 12/7/21 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (View, Pat)
December 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Berner, Crystal)
December 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of filing to plaintiff by Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company re #1 Notice of Removal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Removal)(Tomaso, Robert)
December 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Robert J. Tomaso on behalf of Defendant Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company.(Tomaso, Robert)
December 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of appearance by Robert J. Tomaso on behalf of Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company (Tomaso, Robert)
December 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Boone County, case number 21BA-cv03517, Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7699014. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tomaso, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Foerster v. Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Foerster
Represented By: Alexander Brown
Represented By: Matthew B Uhrig
Represented By: Alexander Marshall Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Watlow Electric Manufacturing Company
Represented By: Robert J. Tomaso
Represented By: Blake Armstrong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?