Shultz v. Citibank, N.A.
| Scott Shultz |
| Citibank, N.A., Citicorp LLC and Citigroup Inc. |
| 2:2022cv04056 |
| April 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Willie J Epps |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER granting #7 motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings. Signed on 5/28/2022 by Magistrate Judge Willie J. Epps, Jr. (Moore, Kaitlin)
|
|
Filing 19
SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #7 MOTION to compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings Surreply filed by J Andrew Hirth on behalf of Plaintiff Scott Shultz. Reply suggestions due by 6/7/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #7 ) (Hirth, J Andrew)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER granting #17 Motion for Leave to File Plaintiff's Surreply in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration. Plaintiff is granted leave to file the proposed surreply [17-1] as a separate and independent electronic docket entry on or before March 31, 2022. Signed on 5/24/2022 by Magistrate Judge Willie J. Epps, Jr. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Moore, Kaitlin)
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION for leave to file Surreply in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by J Andrew Hirth on behalf of Scott Shultz. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/7/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Surreply)(Hirth, J Andrew)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 motion to amend/correct complaint by interlineation. Without objection from the Defendant, Citibank/Citicorp/Citigroup Inc. is amended by interlineation to Citibank, N.A. Signed on 5/23/2022 by Magistrate Judge Willie J. Epps, Jr. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Moore, Kaitlin)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION to amend/correct by Interlineation filed by Brooke Amos Davids on behalf of Scott Shultz. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/3/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Davids, Brooke)
|
|
Filing 14
REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #7 MOTION to compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings filed by Eric A. Todd on behalf of Defendant Citibank, N.A.. (Related document(s) #7 ) (Todd, Eric)
|
|
NOTICE of filing: Mediation and Assessment Program Reminder: Your Designation of Mediator is due soon (filed as an ADR event in CM/ECF). See Notice of Inclusion and MAP General Order for specifics. (ADI, MAP)
|
|
Filing 13
SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #7 MOTION to compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings filed by J Andrew Hirth on behalf of Plaintiff Scott Shultz. Reply suggestions due by 5/19/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #7 ) (Hirth, J Andrew)
|
|
Filing 12
RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 7/3/2022. Rule 26 conference due by 6/12/2022. The parties must follow the formatting of Judge Epps' example scheduling and trial order posted at https://www.mow.uscourts.gov/judges/epps. Signed on 5/5/2022 by Magistrate Judge Willie J. Epps, Jr. (Moore, Kaitlin)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Magistrate Judge Assignment Returned by plaintiff, Scott Shultz and defendant Citibank, N.A.,. Jurisdiction by magistrate judge accepted. ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent)(Berner, Crystal)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of appearance by J Andrew Hirth on behalf of Scott Shultz (Attorney J Andrew Hirth added to party Scott Shultz(pty:pla))(Hirth, J Andrew)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of filing Notice to State Court of Notice of Removal by Citibank, N.A. (Todd, Eric)
|
|
Filing 8
SUGGESTIONS in support re #7 MOTION to compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings filed by Eric A. Todd on behalf of Defendant Citibank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Related document(s) #7 ) (Todd, Eric)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings filed by Eric A. Todd on behalf of Citibank, N.A.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/5/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Todd, Eric)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER ON PRETRIAL PROCEDURES. Service must be obtained on all defendants within forty (40) days of the date of this Order unless otherwise authorized by the Court. Signed on 4/14/2022 by Magistrate Judge Willie J. Epps, Jr. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Moore, Kaitlin)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Warren, Melissa)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of filing of Notice of Removal by Citibank, N.A. (Todd, Eric)
|
|
Filing 3
DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Eric A. Todd on behalf of Defendant Citibank, N.A..(Todd, Eric)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of appearance by Eric A. Todd on behalf of Citibank, N.A. (Todd, Eric)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Camden County, case number 22CM-CC00015, filed by Eric A. Todd. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-7888143. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet , #2 Exhibit A - State Court File)(Todd, Eric)
|
|
NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT as to plaintiff and defendant: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge assignment. Click # here for instructions. Form due by 5/5/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Warren, Melissa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
