Rey v. Edwards
| Justin Todd Rey |
| Hollie Edwards |
| 2:2022cv04108 |
| July 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Nanette K Laughrey |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBITS/EVIDENCE filed by Justin Todd Rey.(Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 22
ORDER that: (1) the agency having custody of Plaintiff forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid ($345.00) (2) the Clerk of the Court shall provide the parties with Mediation Request Forms; (3) the Attorney General of Missouri, Corizon, and Centurion shall notify the Court, in writing, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, as to whether they will or will not waive service of process on Defendant; and (4) Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and 12, within sixty days from the date of this Order if service of process is waived, or within twenty-one days after service of process if service of process is not waived. Signed on 9/6/2022 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (CLERK'S NOTE: Collect filing fee letter mailed to Fulton State Hospital Finance Office with copy of 9/6/2022 Order as directed.)(Willis, Kathy)
|
| RECEIPT number KCMO096765 in the amount of $5.00 issued to Justin Rey. (Woods, Gloria) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER that Plaintiff's motion for order (Doc. #20 ), wherein Plaintiff requests "safer housing" and two hours of "legal resources" a week, is denied. Plaintiff fails to establish that he is entitled to a preliminary injunction regarding his housing, because Plaintiff seeks a change in the relationship of the parties rather than a preservation of the status quo and cannot otherwise satisfy any of the factors for preliminary injunctive relief as set forth in Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C.L. Systems, Inc., 640 F. 2d 109, 113 (8th Cir. 1981). Regarding his request for access to legal resources, Plaintiff admits that he is no longer "on library restriction." The Court further notes that the only deadline currently set by the Court in this case is the September 8, 2022 deadline by which Plaintiff has been ordered to pay the initial partial filing fee. In order to proceed with this case, Plaintiff must first pay the initial partial filing fee or this case will be dismissed without further notice. Signed on 9/1/2022 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Doty, Greg)
|
| Filing 20 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for order filed by Justin Todd Rey. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/12/2022. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 19 PLAINTIFF'S CERTIFICATES OF SERVICE filed by Justin Todd Rey.(Cole, Robert) |
| Filing 18 AMENDED COMPLAINT as directed by Order of 7/28/2022 (Doc. 10) filed by Justin Todd Rey. (Attachments: #1 amended complaint responses continued and evidence)(Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 17 PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT in support of his Complaint filed by Justin Todd Rey.Related document #1 ) (Willis, Kathy) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER that Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (Doc. #15 ) is granted only in that Plaintiff is granted an extension of time, up to and including September 8, 2022, in which to both pay the initial partial filing fee and file a superseding amended complaint. However, Plaintiff fails to establish that he is entitled to conduct discovery before complying with this Court's July 28, 2022 Order (Doc. #10 ). Contrary to Plaintiff's assertions, this Court has not directed Plaintiff to submit documents and evidence in support of his claims but instead has directed him to file a superseding amended complaint that sets forth sufficient allegations of fact which, accepted as true, state a cognizable claim for relief. No further extensions of this deadline will be granted absent a clear demonstration of extraordinary circumstances. Signed on 8/10/2022 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 15 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for extension of time to file amended complaint and to pay the initial partial filing fee filed by Justin Todd Rey. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/22/2022. (Willis, Kathy) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER that the Court has received a discovery request from Plaintiff, which will NOT be filed in the case. The Local Rules require that such documents be served on the parties directly and not be sent to the Court for filing. When the discovery request or response has been served, the party that served the discovery document must then file a certificate of service. Signed on 8/4/2022 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (CLERK'S NOTE: The proposed discovery document, a copy of this Order, and copies of Local Rule 26.3(a) and 26.3(b) mailed to Plaintiff.) Signed on 8/4/2022 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 13 PLAINTIFF'S STATEMENT filed by Justin Todd Rey.(Willis, Kathy) #1 Exhibit Evidence) (Exhibits received on 8/8/22 and added to docket entry on 8/10/2022) (Willis, Kathy). |
|
Filing 12
ORDER that the Court has received a discovery request from Plaintiff, which will NOT be filed in the case. The Local Rules require that such documents be served on the parties directly and not be sent to the Court for filing. When the discovery request or response has been served, the party that served the discovery document must then file a certificate of service. Signed on 8/3/2022 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (CLERK'S NOTE: The proposed discovery document, a copy of this Order, and Local Rule 26.3(a) and 26.3(b) mailed to Plaintiff.) (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 11 PLAINTIFF'S STATEMENT filed by Justin Todd Rey.(Willis, Kathy) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER that: (1) Plaintiff is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, Western Division, an initial partial filing fee of $1.66; (3) the Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff another set of civil rights forms for his use in filing an amended complaint; (4) Plaintiff is directed to file a single superseding amended complaint, as specifically discussed herein; and (5) Plaintiff's failure to both pay the required initial partial filing fee and amend as directed, on or before AUGUST 18, 2022, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on 7/28/2022 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (CLERK'S NOTE: A copy of this Order along with a set of civil rights forms provided to Plaintiff as directed.)(Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of appearance by Courtney R Chapin on behalf of Hollie Edwards (Attorney Courtney R Chapin added to party Hollie Edwards(pty:dft))(Chapin, Courtney) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER that Plaintiff's second motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. #7 ) is denied without prejudice for the reasons set forth in this Court's Order denying Plaintiff's first motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. #4 ). Signed on 7/26/2022 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Doty, Greg)
|
| Filing 7 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Justin Todd Rey. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/8/2022. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 6 PLAINTIFF'S STATEMENT with Exhibits filed by Justin Todd Rey.(Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 5 ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Justin Todd Rey. (Willis, Kathy) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER that: (1) the Attorney General of Missouri shall enter a limited appearance and inform the Court, on or before July 28, 2022, as to whether Plaintiff is a "prisoner" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1915(b), (h) and 1915A; and (2) Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. 3) is denied without prejudice. Signed on 7/18/2022 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (CLERK'S NOTE: The Missouri Attorney General's Office notified by email with an attached copy of this Order.) (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Justin Todd Rey. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Justin Todd Rey. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Justin Todd Rey. (Attachment: #1 Complaint Exhibit)(Willis, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rey v. Edwards | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Justin Todd Rey | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hollie Edwards | |
| Represented By: | Courtney R Chapin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
