Hanks v. United States of America
| Abigail Hanks |
| United States of America |
| 2:2022cv04130 |
| September 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Willie J Epps |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Abigail Hanks. United States Attorney General served on 10/3/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Schleipman, Frederick) Modified on 10/18/2022 to correct service date. NEF regenerated. (Berner, Crystal). |
| United States of America answer deadline due by 11/28/2022. (Berner, Crystal) Modified on 10/24/2022 correcting answer deadline for USA. (Berner, Crystal) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Abigail Hanks. United States of America served on 9/29/2022, answer due 11/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Schleipman, Frederick) Modified on 10/18/2022 to correct answer deadline. NEF regenerated. (Berner, Crystal) Modified on 10/24/2022 to correct answer deadline. NEF regenerated. (Berner, Crystal) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to United States of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General; emailed to plaintiff's counsel. (Berner, Crystal) |
Filing 3
ORDER ON PRETRIAL PROCEDURES. Service must be obtained on all defendants within forty (40) days of the date of this Order unless otherwise authorized by the Court. Signed on 9/6/2022 by Magistrate Judge Willie J. Epps, Jr. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Minkler, Kaitlin)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Berner, Crystal) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America filed by Frederick Raymond Schleipman, Jr on behalf of Abigail Hanks. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-8093651. Service due by 12/5/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schleipman, Frederick) |
| NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT as to plaintiff: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge assignment. Click # here for instructions. Form due by 9/27/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Berner, Crystal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hanks v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Abigail Hanks | |
| Represented By: | Frederick Raymond Schleipman, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
