Paul v. Robinson et al
| Rico Ricardo Paul |
| Robinson, Justin K Jereda, Doris Falkenrath and Jason Lewis |
| 2:2023cv04140 |
| July 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Brian C Wimes |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: This case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If Plaintiff wishes to reassert his claims, he first must pay the filing and administrative fees totaling $402. (Willis, Kathy) |
Filing 5
ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is DENIED; and (2) this case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If Plaintiff wishes to reassert his claims, he first must pay the filing and administrative fees totaling $402. Signed on 7/21/2023 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Willis, Kathy)
|
| Filing 4 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Rico Ricardo Paul. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 3 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Rico Paul. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support of Complaint (Doc. #1 ) filed by Rico Paul. (#1 Exhibits) (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Rico Paul. (#1 Complaint Attachment)(Willis, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
