Union Electric Company v. Brulez et al
Plaintiff: Union Electric Company d/b/a Ameren Missouri, a Missouri corporation
Defendant: Brenan Brulez and Margaret Brulez
Case Number: 2:2023cv04201
Filed: October 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: M Douglas Harpool
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: the parties have informed this Court #10 that a settlement has been reached in this matter. The parties have further requested that the oral hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction be canceled. That hearing, previously scheduled for November 29, 2023, is hereby canceled. All deadlines in this matter are stayed until further order of this Court. The parties are further ordered to reduce their settlement to writing and provide this Court with stipulation of dismissal no later than January 26, 2024. Signed District Judge M. Douglas Harpool November 27, 2023. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Clark, Christopher)
November 27, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE of settlement JOINT NOTICE by All Plaintiffs (Miller, Amanda)
November 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 1/11/2024. Rule 26 conference due by 12/27/2023. Signed on 11/27/23 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (View, Pat)
November 27, 2023 NOTICE OF HEARING CANCELLATION - The Preliminary Injunction Hearing scheduled for 11/29/23 9:30 a.m. has been cancelled. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Howard, Linda)
November 14, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE OF HEARING - This is the official notice for this hearing. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. Hearing on Motion for Preliminary Injunction set for 11/29/2023 09:30 AM in Courtroom 4B, Jefferson City (VDJJC) before District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (Howard, Linda)
November 13, 2023 Filing 7 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #2 MOTION for preliminary injunction and Suggestions in Support filed by Zane G. Williams on behalf of Defendants Brenan Brulez, Margaret Brulez. Reply suggestions due by 11/27/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #2 ) (Williams, Zane)
November 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction no later than November 20, 2023. Signed District Judge M. Douglas Harpool November 6, 2023. (Clark, Christopher)
November 3, 2023 Answer due for Brenan Brulez and Margaret Brulez on 1/17/2024. (Warren, Melissa)
October 25, 2023 Answer due Brenan Brulez and Margaret Brulez on 1/17/2023. (Warren, Melissa)
October 20, 2023 Filing 5 RETURN OF WAIVER OF SERVICE filed by Margaret Brulez and Brenan Brulez. Waiver sent to Margaret Brulez and Brenan Brulez on 10/18/2023, answer due 1/17/2024. (Williams, Zane) Modified on 10/23/2023 to reflect answer deadline. NEF regenerated (Warren, Melissa). Modified on 11/3/2023 to reflect correct answer date of 1/17/2024. NEF regenerated (Warren, Melissa).
October 20, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of appearance by Zane G. Williams on behalf of All Defendants (Attorney Zane G. Williams added to party Brenan Brulez(pty:dft), Attorney Zane G. Williams added to party Margaret Brulez(pty:dft))(Williams, Zane)
October 17, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to United States Magistrate Judge Willie J. Epps, Jr. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Lock, Tania)
October 17, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for preliminary injunction and Suggestions in Support filed by Amanda Allen Miller on behalf of Union Electric Company d/b/a AmerenUE and/or Ameren Missouri. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/31/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Miller, Amanda)
October 17, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Amanda Allen Miller on behalf of Union Electric Company d/b/a AmerenUE and/or Ameren Missouri. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-8672795. Service due by 1/16/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Miller, Amanda)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Union Electric Company v. Brulez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Union Electric Company d/b/a Ameren Missouri, a Missouri corporation
Represented By: Matthew R Quetsch
Represented By: Amanda Allen Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brenan Brulez
Represented By: Zane G. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Margaret Brulez
Represented By: Zane G. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?