Dorsey et al v. Columbia Police Department et al
Emmit Dorsey and Deshonda Shannon |
Columbia Police Department, Tanner Gillispie, Kyle Whitmire and Sean Dutton |
2:2024cv04010 |
January 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Stephen R Bough |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Before the Court is Plaintiffs Emmit Dorsey (Dorsey) and Deshonda Shannon's (Shannon) (collectively, Plaintiffs) pro se Application for Leave to File Action Without Payment of Fees with Affidavit of Financial Status in Support. (Doc. #1.) As set forth within, the motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and this case is DISMISSED. Signed on 1/23/2024 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Murphy-Carr, Shauna) A copy of the order sent via first class mail to: Emmit Dorsey and Deshonda Shannon, 2808 Blackfoot Road, Lot 1, Columbia, MO 65202. |
Filing 2 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Emmit Dorsey, Deshonda Shannon. (Woods, Gloria) |
Filing 1 Pro Se MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by All Plaintiffs. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/5/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope) Motion for IFP form not attached to case opening documents. Plaintiffs were mailed motion form and directed to complete and return as soon as possible.(Woods, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.