Blase v. City of Neosho et al
| Jan Blase |
| City of Neosho, Heather Bowers, Richard Davidson, Warren Langland, Matt Peringer and Steven Hays |
| 3:2010cv03311 |
| August 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Joplin Office |
| Newton |
| John T. Maughmer |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 47 defendant's motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, summary judgment is entered in favor of defendant City of Neosho on the issue of salary post-termination benefits, but in favor of plaintiff Jan M. Blase on the issue of health insurance post-termination benefits. Signed on 10/30/12 by Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer. (Alexander, Pam)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting 31 plaintiff's motion for leave to file amended complaint; granting 22 defendant's motion for summary judgment and setting telephone pretrial conference for 10:00 a.m., Friday, October 21, 2011. See Order for details. Signed on 10/17/11 by Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer. (Alexander, Pam)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER granting 16 motion to substitute party. Accordingly the Clerk of the Court shall substitute Steve Hart for Defendant Heather Bowers; Charles Collinsworth for Defendant Matt Persinger; and David Ruth for Defendant Christopher Wright. Signed on 6/30/11 by Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer. (Alexander, Pam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
