Friend v. Aegis Communications Group, LLC

Defendant: Aegis Communications Group, LLC
Plaintiff: Mandi Friend
Case Number: 3:2013cv05054
Filed: May 2, 2013
Court: Missouri Western District Court
Office: Joplin Office
County: Jasper
Presiding Judge: Ortrie D. Smith
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 9, 2014 77 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting in part and denying in part 61 motion for summary judgment Signed on 9/9/14 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (View, Pat)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Friend v. Aegis Communications Group, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aegis Communications Group, LLC
Represented By: Jeremy M Brenner
Represented By: Robert A Kaiser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mandi Friend
Represented By: Anne W. Schiavone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.