Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Cunningham Sandblasting & Painting Company, Inc.
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland |
Cunningham Sandblasting & Painting Company, Inc. |
3:2019cv05038 |
May 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Stephen R Bough |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION for default judgment against Cunningham Sandblasting filed by Benjamin J Stringer on behalf of Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/11/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Stringer Affidavit, #2 Exhibit 2 - Finley Affidavit)(Stringer, Benjamin) |
Filing 6 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Cunningham Sandblasting & Painting Company, Inc. (Diefenbach, Tracy) Copy of this document mailed to: Cunningham Sandblasting & Painting Co. d/b/a Cunningham, Inc., Tom Walters, Agent for Service, 508 South Sergeant, Joplin, Mo 64801. |
Filing 5 MOTION for default judgment filed by Carol Z. Smith on behalf of Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/2/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of Benjamin J. Stringer)(Smith, Carol) |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. (Stringer, Benjamin) |
Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. Cunningham Sandblasting & Painting Company, Inc. served on 5/10/2019, answer due 5/31/2019. (Smith, Carol) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Siegert, Karen) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cunningham Sandblasting & Painting Company, Inc. filed by Carol Z. Smith on behalf of Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. Filing fee $400, receipt number AMOWDC-6309489. Service due by 8/8/2019 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Subcontract, #3 Exhibit Ratification Agreement)(Smith, Carol) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Cunningham Sandblasting & Painting Company, Inc.. (Siegert, Karen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Cunningham Sandblasting & Painting Company, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Cunningham Sandblasting & Painting Company, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland | |
Represented By: | Benjamin J Stringer |
Represented By: | Carol Z. Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.