McLaughlin v. CN Associates, Inc. et al
| Kevin McLaughlin |
| CN Associates, Inc. and Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv05104 |
| December 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Bough |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Kevin McLaughlin's Application for Leave to File Action Without Payment of Fees with Affidavit of Financial Status in Support. (Doc. #1). The motion is DENIED for the reasons stated in this Order. Plaintiff is directed to pay the filing fee within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order, or the case will be dismissed. Signed on 1/6/2020 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. Copy of this Order has been mailed to: Kevin McLaughlin; 3151 Deer Creek Road; Noel, MO 64854. (Ellis, Lindsey)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Furtak, Rebecca) |
| Filing 1 Pro Se MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kevin McLaughlin. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/3/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Furtak, Rebecca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
