Schoenauer v. Saul
Tina M. Schoenauer |
Andrew M. Saul |
3:2020cv05110 |
November 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Lajuana M Counts |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE of Social Security complaint on United States Attorney. Summons served on 12/9/2020 Social security answer due by 2/8/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. Record of Submission due by 3/9/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Served: ORC 12/10/20; US Atty 12/9/20; Atty general 12/16/20)(Overton, Kathleen) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Magistrate Assignment Returned by Andrew M. Saul, Tina M. Schoenauer. Jurisdiction by magistrate accepted. ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent)(Melvin, Greg) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and emailed to Plaintiff's counsel. (Keller, Jeanne) |
Filing 3 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT filed by Kathleen Overton on behalf of Tina M. Schoenauer. (Filing fee $400 receipt number IFP) filed byKathleen Overton on behalf of Tina M. Schoenauer. Service due by 2/15/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Overton, Kathleen) |
Filing 2 ORAL ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to File Action Without Payment of Fees, Costs, or Security, With Affidavit of Financial Status in Support. Plaintiff's counsel shall be responsible for electronically filing the Complaint within 10 days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff shall be responsible for serving process in the manner described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i).Signed on November 17, 2020 by Magistrate Judge Lajuana M. Counts. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Clinton, Erica) |
Filing 1 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kathleen Overton on behalf of Tina M. Schoenauer. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/30/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint)(Attorney Kathleen Overton added to party Tina M. Schoenauer(pty:pla))(Overton, Kathleen) |
NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE ASSIGNMENT as to Plaintiff: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge assignment. Click # here for instructions. Plaintiff's Form due by 12/7/2020 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Furtak, Rebecca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Schoenauer v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tina M. Schoenauer | |
Represented By: | Kathleen Overton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul | |
Represented By: | OGCSSAR7 |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.