Gammage v. USA
| John Paul Gamage |
| USA |
| 3:2021cv05015 |
| January 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Brian C Wimes |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED that this case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the Court's Orders. Any motion to reopen must be filed within a reasonable time and must be accompanied by Movant's response, as previously ordered. (Davies, Cindy) |
Filing 7
ORDER: ORDERED that this case is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the Court's Orders. Any motion to reopen must be filed within a reasonable time and must be accompanied by Movant's response, as previously ordered. Signed on March 11, 2021 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Davies, Cindy)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER that, because Movant has not filed a response as directed in this Court's January 29, 2021 Order (Doc. 5 ), Movant shall SHOW CAUSE, on or before March 9, 2021, as to why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) due to Movant's failure to comply with this Court's Orders. Movant's failure to file a timely response will result in dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on February 23, 2021 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| MAIL RETURNED as undeliverable, "marked return to sender, no such number, unable to forward". Mail sent to John Paul Gammage. (Related documents new case acknowledgment letter and Doc. 5 ) (Willis, Kathy) |
| RECEIPT number KCMO088386 in the amount of $400 issued to John Gamage. (Crocker, Susan) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER that, Movant show cause on or before February 21, 2021, why this case should not be dismissed as untimely and for failure to assert a cognizable legal theory justifying relief. Signed on January 29, 2021 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of appearance by James Joseph Kelleher on behalf of USA (Attorney James Joseph Kelleher added to party USA(pty:res))(Kelleher, James) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by John Paul Gamage. (Willis, Kathy) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (2255) filed by John Paul Gamage.(Willis, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gammage v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | James Joseph Kelleher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: John Paul Gamage | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
