Khadivi v. Saul
Plaintiff: Ashley Khadivi
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 3:2021cv05059
Filed: June 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: W Brian Gaddy
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #4 Attorney Kathleen Overton's motion to withdraw as attorney. With the entry of appearance of substitute counsel Kelsey Young #5 and pursuant to Local Rule 83.2, Ms. Overton's motion is granted, and she is terminated as counsel of record for Plaintiff. Signed on 8/20/21 by Magistrate Judge W. Brian Gaddy. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Kitsmiller, Julia)
August 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of appearance by Kelsey Young on behalf of Ashley Khadivi (Attorney Kelsey Young added to party Ashley Khadivi(pty:pla))(Young, Kelsey)
August 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to withdraw as attorney filed by Kathleen Overton on behalf of Ashley Khadivi. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/3/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Overton, Kathleen)
July 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE of Social Security complaint on United States Attorney. Summons served on 7/6/2021 Social security answer due by 9/7/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. Record of Submission due by 10/4/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Served: Atty General 7/12/21; US Atty 7/6/21; ORC 7/6/21)(Overton, Kathleen)
July 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Magistrate Judge Assignment Returned by Ashley Khadivi, Andrew M. Saul. Jurisdiction by magistrate judge accepted. ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent)(Melvin, Greg)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT filed by Kathleen Overton on behalf of Ashley Khadivi. (Filing fee $402 receipt number AMOWDC-7475373) filed byKathleen Overton on behalf of Ashley Khadivi. Service due by 9/28/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Attorney Kathleen Overton added to party Ashley Khadivi(pty:pla))(Overton, Kathleen)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT as to all parties: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge assignment. Click # here for instructions. Form due by 7/21/2021 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Siegert, Karen)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order SUMMONS ISSUED as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Siegert, Karen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Khadivi v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: OGCSSAR7
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Khadivi
Represented By: Kathleen Overton
Represented By: Kelsey Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?