Ecologic Synergies International, Inc. et al v. 303 Development, LLC et al
| Ecologic Synergies International, Inc. and Modern Mod Inc. |
| 303 Development, LLC and Greg Krom |
| 3:2022cv05087 |
| November 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Beth Phillips |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER re #3 The parties were ordered to file a proposed scheduling order by January 3, 2023. To date, there has not been one filed. The parties shall file their proposed scheduling order by January 20, 2023. Signed on 1/6/23 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Cordell, Annette)
|
| Filing 10 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #8 MOTION to remand to State Court filed by Nicholas Rex Daugherty on behalf of Defendants 303 Development, LLC, Greg Krom. Reply suggestions due by 1/11/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #8 ) (Daugherty, Nicholas) |
| Filing 9 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #4 MOTION to dismiss case filed by Nicholas Rex Daugherty on behalf of Defendants 303 Development, LLC, Greg Krom. (Related document(s) #4 ) (Daugherty, Nicholas) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to remand to State Court filed by Austin Knoblock on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/29/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Knoblock, Austin) |
| Filing 7 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #4 MOTION to dismiss case filed by Austin Knoblock on behalf of Plaintiffs Ecologic Synergies International, Inc., Modern Mod Inc.. Reply suggestions due by 12/29/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #4 ) (Knoblock, Austin) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why Defendants' Motion to Dismiss should not be granted. Plaintiff shall respond to the Motion to Dismiss or otherwise show cause why it should not be granted by 12/21/2022. Signed on 12/7/2022 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Wolfe, Steve)
|
| Filing 5 SUGGESTIONS in support re #4 MOTION to dismiss case filed by Nicholas Rex Daugherty on behalf of Defendants 303 Development, LLC, Greg Krom. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Petition, #2 Exhibit B - Krom Declaration)(Related document(s) #4 ) (Daugherty, Nicholas) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to dismiss case filed by Nicholas Rex Daugherty on behalf of 303 Development, LLC, Greg Krom. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/2/2022 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Daugherty, Nicholas) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER. RULE 16 NOTICE. Proposed scheduling order due by 1/3/2023. Rule 26 conference due by 12/20/2022. Signed on 11/16/22 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Cordell, Annette)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Siegert, Karen) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Newton County, case number 22NW-CV01529, filed by Bruce A. Moothart. Filing fee $402, receipt number AMOWDC-8190555. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Petition, #3 Exhibit B - Summonses, #4 Exhibit C - Krom Declaration, #5 Exhibit D - Notice to Plaintiffs, #6 Exhibit E - Notice to State Court of Filing NOR)(Moothart, Bruce) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
