Wolfe v. United States Dept. of Justice et al
Plaintiff: Ray-D Wolfe
Defendant: United States Dept. of Justice, United States Dept. of the Treasury, United States Dept. of State, State of Missouri, Missouri Department of Social Services, Greene County Missouri, Reginald L. Martin and Brian T. Neal
Case Number: 3:2023cv05006
Filed: February 3, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: M Douglas Harpool
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2023 Filing 13 PRO SE MOTION for Change of Judge filed by Ray-D Wolfe. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/5/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Envelope) (Hanna, Jaime) Modified on 3/22/2023 NEF mailed to Ray-D Wolfe, c/o 23142 Lawrence 1210 Aurora, MO 65605 (Hanna, Jaime).
March 8, 2023 Filing 12 PRO SE SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #7 MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction on behalf of Plaintiff Ray-D Wolfe. Reply suggestions due by 3/22/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Related document(s) #7 ) (Siegert, Karen)
March 8, 2023 Filing 11 PRO SE SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #10 MOTION to stay Discovery, Mediation, and Rule 26 Activities on behalf of Plaintiff Ray-D Wolfe. Reply suggestions due by 3/22/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Related document(s) #10 ) (Siegert, Karen)
February 28, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION to stay Discovery, Mediation, and Rule 26 Activities filed by Riley A. O'Shaughnessy on behalf of Reginald L. Martin, Missouri Department of Social Services, State of Missouri. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/14/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attorney Riley A. O'Shaughnessy added to party Missouri Department of Social Services(pty:dft), Attorney Riley A. O'Shaughnessy added to party State of Missouri(pty:dft))(O'Shaughnessy, Riley)
February 23, 2023 Filing 9 PRO SE SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM on behalf of Plaintiff Ray-D Wolfe. Reply suggestions due by 3/9/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Related document(s) #3 ) (Siegert, Karen)
February 23, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION to stay early assessment, and rule 26 proceedings filed by Nicholas Austin Fax on behalf of Greene County Missouri. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/9/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Fax, Nicholas)
February 23, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction filed by Riley A. O'Shaughnessy on behalf of Reginald L. Martin. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/9/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (O'Shaughnessy, Riley)
February 23, 2023 Filing 6 SUGGESTION OF DEATH by Reginald L. Martin. (O'Shaughnessy, Riley)
February 23, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of appearance by Riley A. O'Shaughnessy on behalf of Reginald L. Martin (Attorney Riley A. O'Shaughnessy added to party Reginald L. Martin(pty:dft))(O'Shaughnessy, Riley)
February 13, 2023 Filing 4 SUGGESTIONS in support re #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Nicholas Austin Fax on behalf of Defendants Greene County Missouri, Brian T. Neal. (Related document(s) #3 ) (Fax, Nicholas)
February 13, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Nicholas Austin Fax on behalf of Greene County Missouri, Brian T. Neal. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/27/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attorney Nicholas Austin Fax added to party Greene County Missouri(pty:dft), Attorney Nicholas Austin Fax added to party Brian T. Neal(pty:dft))(Fax, Nicholas)
February 6, 2023 RECEIPT number KCMO098795 in the amount of $402.00 issued to WOLFE WELDING CONSTRUCTION INC.. (Kern, Kendra)
February 3, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to an outside mediator. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order)(Siegert, Karen)
February 3, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ray-D Wolfe Ray-D Wolfe. Service due by 5/4/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Siegert, Karen)
February 3, 2023 SUMMONSES ISSUED as to Greene County Missouri, Reginald L. Martin, Missouri Department of Social Services, Brian T. Neal, State of Missouri, United States Dept. of Justice, United States Dept. of State, and United States Dept. of the Treasury. (Siegert, Karen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wolfe v. United States Dept. of Justice et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ray-D Wolfe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Dept. of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Dept. of the Treasury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Dept. of State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Missouri
Represented By: Riley A. O'Shaughnessy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Missouri Department of Social Services
Represented By: Riley A. O'Shaughnessy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greene County Missouri
Represented By: Nicholas Austin Fax
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reginald L. Martin
Represented By: Riley A. O'Shaughnessy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian T. Neal
Represented By: Nicholas Austin Fax
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?