Claude v. Kijakazi
Plaintiff: Cathy Jo Claude
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Case Number: 3:2023cv05024
Filed: April 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: M Douglas Harpool
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2023 Filing 7 ANSWER/Submission of Administrative Record filed by Elizabeth D Hatting on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi. Plaintiffs social security brief due by 7/25/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 001 Certification Page.pdf, #2 002 Court Transcript Index.pdf, #3 003 Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable.pdf, #4 004 Payment Documents and Decisions.pdf, #5 005 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices.pdf, #6 006 Non Disability Related Development.pdf, #7 007 Disability Related Development.pdf, #8 008 Medical Records.pdf)(Related document(s) #3 ) (Hatting, Elizabeth)
April 18, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of appearance by Elizabeth D Hatting on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Attorney Elizabeth D Hatting added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Hatting, Elizabeth)
April 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER - SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Signed on 4/18/23 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (View, Pat)
April 18, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Social Security Case. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has generated a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the U.S. Attorney's Office of the case filing. No summons shall issue. (Furtak, Rebecca)
April 17, 2023 Filing 3 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT filed by Kelsey Young on behalf of Cathy Jo Claude. (Filing fee $402 receipt number IFP) filed byKelsey Young on behalf of Cathy Jo Claude. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Young, Kelsey)
April 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER granting #1 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall file the complaint within 20 days. Plaintiff shall be responsible for serving process. Signed on 4/17/23 by District Judge M. Douglas Harpool. (Howard, Linda)
April 17, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kelsey Young on behalf of Cathy Jo Claude. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/1/2023 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint)(Attorney Kelsey Young added to party Cathy Jo Claude(pty:pla))(Young, Kelsey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Claude v. Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cathy Jo Claude
Represented By: Kelsey Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Represented By: OGCSSAR7
Represented By: Elizabeth D Hatting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?