Brotherhood of Railway Signalmen v. BNSF Railway, Inc.
| Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen |
| BNSF Railway, Inc. |
| 3:2024cv05021 |
| March 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| M Douglas Harpool |
| Labor: Railway Labor Act |
| 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #13 MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Brian M. Bartlett on behalf of Defendant BNSF Railway, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Related document(s) #13 ) (Bartlett, Brian) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET MODIFICATION. A modification has been made to the document filed on 5/14/2024 as Document No. 20, Suggestions in Support. The document has been deleted as the incorrect event was used when filing the document. Counsel will refile the document using the correct event: Civil > Motions and Related Filings > Responses/Replies/Suggestions > Reply Suggestions to Motion. This is a text entry only - no document is attached. (Hanna, Jaime) |
| Filing 20 SUGGESTIONS in support re #13 MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Brian M. Bartlett on behalf of Defendant BNSF Railway, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Related document(s) #13 ) (Bartlett, Brian) |
| Filing 19 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #13 MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Jason R. McClitis on behalf of Plaintiff Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen. Reply suggestions due by 5/14/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Second Declaration of Jeremy Huckabee)(Related document(s) #13 ) (McClitis, Jason) |
|
|
| Filing 17 REPLY SUGGESTIONS to motion re #11 MOTION to stay re #7 MOTION for summary judgment Briefing and Memorandum in Support filed by Brian M. Bartlett on behalf of Defendant BNSF Railway, Inc.. (Related document(s) #11 ) (Bartlett, Brian) |
| Filing 16 SUGGESTIONS in opposition re #11 MOTION to stay re #7 MOTION for summary judgment Briefing and Memorandum in Support filed by Jason R. McClitis on behalf of Plaintiff Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen. Reply suggestions due by 5/3/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Related document(s) #11 ) (McClitis, Jason) |
| Filing 15 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE INTERESTS filed by Brian M. Bartlett on behalf of Defendant BNSF Railway, Inc..(Bartlett, Brian) |
| Filing 14 SUGGESTIONS in support re #13 MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Brian M. Bartlett on behalf of Defendant BNSF Railway, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Related document(s) #13 ) (Bartlett, Brian) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Brian M. Bartlett on behalf of BNSF Railway, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/30/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Bartlett, Brian) |
|
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to stay re #7 MOTION for summary judgment Briefing and Memorandum in Support filed by Brian M. Bartlett on behalf of BNSF Railway, Inc.. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/26/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Related document(s) #7 ) (Bartlett, Brian) |
| Filing 10 Motion to allow David M. Pryor to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-8958302) filed by Brian M. Bartlett on behalf of BNSF Railway, Inc.. (Bartlett, Brian) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of appearance by Brian M. Bartlett on behalf of BNSF Railway, Inc. (Attorney Brian M. Bartlett added to party BNSF Railway, Inc.(pty:dft))(Bartlett, Brian) |
| Filing 8 SUGGESTIONS in support re #7 MOTION for summary judgment filed by Jason R. McClitis on behalf of Plaintiff Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jeremy Huckabee, #2 Declaration of Steve Bergeson)(Related document(s) #7 ) (McClitis, Jason) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for summary judgment filed by Jason R. McClitis on behalf of Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/29/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (McClitis, Jason) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE of complaint executed by Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen. BNSF Railway, Inc. served on 3/28/2024, answer due 4/18/2024. (Howell, Garrison) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of appearance by Garrison Howell on behalf of Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen (Attorney Garrison Howell added to party Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen(pty:pla))(Howell, Garrison) |
|
|
| Filing 3 Motion to allow Richard Edelman to appear pro hac vice (Pro Hac fee $100 receipt number AMOWDC-8929842) filed by Jason R. McClitis on behalf of Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen. (Attachments: #1 Attachment to Petition for Admission Pro Hac Vice)(McClitis, Jason) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INCLUSION FOR MEDIATION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (MAP). REVIEW NOTICE AND MAP GENERAL ORDER CAREFULLY FOR IMPORTANT CHANGES, DEADLINES AND REQUIREMENTS.Notice of MAP assignment to outside neutral category I. (Attachments: #1 MAP General Order) (Hanna, Jaime) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jason R. McClitis on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Filing fee $405, receipt number AMOWDC-8925105. Service due by 6/20/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(McClitis, Jason) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to BNSF Railway, Inc.. (Woods, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.