Cook v. Social Security Administration
| Ralph Edward Cook |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2026cv05021 |
| March 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| W Brian Gaddy |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Magistrate Judge Assignment Returned by Ralph Edward Cook and Social Security Administration. Jurisdiction by magistrate judge accepted. ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent)(CRG) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of appearance by Jeffrey P. Ray on behalf of Social Security Administration (Attorney Jeffrey P. Ray added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft))(Ray, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Social Security Case. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has generated a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the U.S. Attorney's Office of the case filing. No summons shall issue. This is a text entry only - no document is attached. (JWJ) |
| Filing 3 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT filed by Kelsey Young on behalf of Ralph Edward Cook. (Filing fee $405 receipt number IFP) filed byKelsey Young on behalf of Ralph Edward Cook. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Young, Kelsey) |
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall electronically file the Complaint within seven days from the date ofthis Order. Signed on 3/30/2026 by Magistrate Judge W. Brian Gaddy. (MKN)
|
| NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT as to Plaintiff: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge assignment. Click # here for instructions. Form due by 4/17/2026 unless otherwise directed by the court. (JWJ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Kelsey Young on behalf of Ralph Edward Cook. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/9/2026 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Attorney Kelsey Young added to party Ralph Edward Cook(pty:pla))(Young, Kelsey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cook v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ralph Edward Cook | |
| Represented By: | Kelsey Young |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Ssaogcomms Ssaogcomms |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey P. Ray |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
