Purkey v. United States of America
| 4:2006cv08001 |
| November 25, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Kansas City Office |
| Fernando J. Gaitan |
| Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
ORDER denying 107 Purkey's motion for certificate of appealability. Signed on 10/28/10 by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER denying 91 movant's motion to alter judgment and granting movant's Motion to Withdraw 100 and movant's Pro Se Motion 99 is WITHDRAWN. Signed by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. on 12/22/09. (Enss, Rhonda)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER DENYING movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct His Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 47 ; DENYING the Motion to Strike the Statement of Frederick A. Duchardt, Jr. 83 ; DENYING the Motion to Set Matter for an Evidentiary Hearing 84 ; and DENYING AS MOOT the Motion for Leave to File Late Response to Motion to Strike Statement of Frederick A. Duchardt Jr. 87 .Signed by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. on 9/29/09. (Enss, Rhonda)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Purkey v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
