Adkins et al v. Option One Mortgage Corp.
| Billy B Adkins and Cheryl R Adkins |
| Option One Mortgage Corp. |
| 4:2008cv00286 |
| April 16, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Kansas City Office |
| Clay |
| Fernando J. Gaitan |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER - plaintiffs' Motion for a Rule 55 Judgment by Default 34 is DENIED; Motion to Dismiss Complaint as to Defendant McNearney & Associates, L.L.C. 7 is GRANTED; defendants Sutton and Circuit Court's Motion to Dismiss 5 is GRANTED; Motion to Dismiss Complaint or in the Alternative Quash Service of Process as to Defendants Timothy A. McNearney, Brandon T. Pittenger and C. Spence Stover 20 is GRANTED in part as it relates to dismissal of this matter, and DENIED AS MOOT in part as it relates to the motion to quash service of process; and defendant Sand Canyon f/k/a Option One Mortgage Corporation and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss 24 is GRANTED. Clerk shall mail copy of this Order to plaintiffs by regular and certified mail. Signed by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. on 1/5/09. (Enss, Rhonda) Modified on 1/6/2009; order mailed to plaintiffs by regular and certified mail (70022410000158618595) (Carr, Lori).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
