Hicks v. Clay County, Missouri et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 6, 2010
ORDER granting 126 defendant Chessin's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and denying as moot 136 motion for protective order. Signed on 12/06/10 by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda)
|July 27, 2010
ORDER - Motions terminated: denying 95 plaintiff's MOTION to Enforce Settlement Agreement. Joint proposed scheduling and trial order due on or before 8/12/2010. Signed on 7/27/10 by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda)
|October 30, 2008
ORDER - Defendant Chessin's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, and Improper Venue 15 is GRANTED IN PART as it relates to plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims and DENIED IN PART as to a ll other aspects; Defendant Chessin's Suggestion in Support of his Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim upon which Relief can be Granted 20 is GRANTED IN PART as it relates to claims against defendant Chessin in his official capacity and DENIED IN PART as to all other aspects; Defendant Chessin's Suggestion in Support of his Motion to Stay Discovery 21 is DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Suggestions in Opposition to Defendant Chessin's M otion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, with Suggestions in Support 27 is GRANTED, and the Court treats the information contained in Doc. No. 27 as properly-filed supplemental suggestions in opposition to the motion to dismiss; and Defendant Paul Chessin's Motion for 14 Day Enlargement of Time to File Reply in Support of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss and Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to the Stay 31 is GRANTED and the Court treats Defendant Chessin's reply suggestions (Doc. No. 33) as timely-filed. Signed by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. on 10/30/08. (Enss, Rhonda)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?