Kaplafka v. Hickman Mills School District et al
| Michael Steven Kaplafka |
| Hickman Mills School District and Betty Brown |
| 4:2008cv00933 |
| December 15, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Jackson |
| Gary A. Fenner |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
ORDER granting 56 motion for summary judgment; finding as moot 58 motion for summary judgment; finding as moot 75 motion to strike ; finding as moot 76 motion to strike ; finding as moot 77 motion to strike ; finding as moot 78 motion to strike ; finding as moot 79 motion to strike ; finding as moot 82 motion to strike ; denying 86 motion to strike ; denying 87 motion to strike ; denying 88 motion to strike ; denying 89 motion to strike ; denying 90 motion to strike ; denying 91 motion to strike ; finding as moot 120 motion for extension of time. Signed on 6/8/10 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (Mitchell, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER granting extension of time re 15 MOTION for extension of time filed by Michael Steven Kaplafka. Signed by District Judge Gary A. Fenner on 4/29/09. (Mitchell, Lisa) Copy mailed to Michael Steven Kaplafka, 4504 E. 184th Street, Belton, MO 64012 on 4/30/2009 (McDowell, Shelly).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
