ASAI, Inc. v. Guest + Reddick, Inc.
Plaintiff: ASAI, Inc.
Defendant: Guest + Reddick, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2009cv00041
Filed: January 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: Fernando J. Gaitan
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER granting 17 defendants' alternative motion to transfer to District of Arkansas. Signed by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. on 6/10/09. (Enss, Rhonda)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ASAI, Inc. v. Guest + Reddick, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Guest + Reddick, Inc.
Represented By: Michael G Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ASAI, Inc.
Represented By: Greg Thomas Spies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?