Miller v. Levy et al
| Kathyrn Miller |
| Ronald J Levy, Tim Decker, Judy M Parrett, Robin Graves, Rhonda Hayes, Division of Youth Services of the State of Missouri, State of Missouri, State of Missouri Department of Social Services, Amanda Taylor and John Does 1-12 |
| 4:2009cv00856 |
| October 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Kansas City Office |
| Lafayette |
| Fernando J. Gaitan |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 62 defendants' motion to dismiss as detailed in order. Signed on 11/2/10 by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDERED granting 46 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend to Substitute Real Party in interest and plaintiff Anthony Miller is substituted for plaintiff Kathryn Miller for all further purposes. Plaintiff shall file his proposed amended complaint electronically on or before Tuesday, August 10, 2010. Defendant's motion to dismiss 43 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed on 8/5/2010 by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Baldwin, Joella)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER granting 4 defendants' State of Missouri, Department of Social Services, and Division of Youth Services' motion to dismiss. All claims against these defendants are dismissed. Signed by Chief District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. on 12/11/09. (Enss, Rhonda)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
