M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Sunrise Farms Development, LLC, f/k/a Rausch Coleman Cray, LLC, et al
| M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank |
| SUNRISE FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC f/k/a RAUSCH COLEMAN CRAY, LLC, ERNEST R. COLEMAN, SR., DANIEL E. WHITNEY, GARY MADDOCK, BYARS & 150 ENTERPRISES, LLC, THE MADDOCK GROUP, L.L.C. and FAMILY LAND INVESTORS LLC |
| 4:2010cv00627 |
| June 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Kansas City Office |
| Jackson |
| Scott O. Wright |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
165
ORDER granting 136 motion for revival of judgment. Signed on 8/25/2023 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Skelton, Sara)
|
|
Filing
148
ORDER granting 146 motion to continue show cause hearing (Hearing set for 5/11/2023, at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 8B, Kansas City before District Judge Roseann Ketchmark); granting 147 motion for appointment of process server. Signed on 3/13/2023 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Skelton, Sara)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDERED that plaintiff BMO Harris Bank, N.A., successor by merger to M&I Marshall & Ilsley Banks Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #84) is granted in part and denied in part. It is furtherORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order the Bank shall provide its fair market estimation of the property. Signed on 6/28/2012 by District Judge Scott O. Wright. (McIlvain, Kelly)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
