Hillcrest Bank v. Cordsen et al
| Hillcrest Bank |
| Jack H Cordsen, Jack H. Cordsen Trust UTA dated February 12, 2007, or his successor in trust, a Trust, Hidden Ridge Building Corporation and Winterberry Development LLC |
| 4:2010cv00967 |
| October 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Kansas City Office |
| Jackson |
| Greg Kays |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
ORDER granting 98 Plaintiff's motion to strike jury demand. Signed on 7/5/11 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Francis, Alexandra)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER granting 61 Courterclaim Defendant Hillcrest's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim. Signed on 6/28/11 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Francis, Alexandra)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER GRANTING IN PART INDIVIDUAL MOTIONS TO DISMISS re documents 25 27 43 48 68 . Counterclaim Count I is dismissed without prejudice against Rice; Counterclaim Counts XII and XIII are dismissed without prejudice against Defendants Hillc rest, Rice, Forgey, and Wheeler; Counterclaim Count XIV is dismissed without prejudice against Forgey and Wheeler only; Counterclaim Counts XVII and XVIII are dismissed without prejudice against all of the Counterclaim Defendants except Hillcrest; and all fraud allegations in Counterclaim Counts VIII, IX, X, and XI must be re-plead with particularity. Signed on 6/1/11 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Francis, Alexandra)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
