Cox et al v. KLS Martin, L.P.
| Jeremiah Cox, Chad Cox and Courtney Cox |
| KLS Martin, L.P. |
| 4:2010cv01204 |
| December 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Kansas City Office |
| Andrew |
| Ortrie D. Smith |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
185
ORDER entered by Judge Ortrie D. Smith. Defendant's Motion (Doc. No. 182) for an order staying enforcement of the judgment is granted. (Matthes, Renea)
|
|
Filing
179
ORDER AND OPINION entered by Judge Ortrie D. Smith denying 162 MOTION for order Remittitur, denying 164 MOTION for new trial, and denying 166 MOTION for judgment as a matter of law (Renewed). (Matthes, Renea)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER and OPINION granting 104 Plaintiff's Motion for Order Regarding Value of Medical Treatment ; granting 106 Defendant leave to present exhibits of amounts accepted by medical providers and granting defendant leave to amend exhibit list. Signed on 08/13/2012 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Will-Fees, Eva)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER and OPINION granting 80 motion in limine; granting in part and denying in part 82 motion in limine Signed on 04/11/2012 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Will-Fees, Eva)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER and OPINION granting in part and denying in part 63 motion for summary judgment. Signed on 02/27/2012 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Will-Fees, Eva)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
