Collins v. Dormire
Petitioner: Warren Rusty Collins
Respondent: Dave Dormire
Case Number: 4:2011cv00830
Filed: August 22, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Cole
Presiding Judge: Greg Kays
Presiding Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) petitioner's motion to stay these proceedings (Doc. No. 5 ) and motion to amend the petition (Doc. No. 6 ) are denied; (2) the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied; (3) the issuance of a certificate of appealability is denied; and (3) this case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed on December 2, 2011 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Thoennes, Cindy)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Collins v. Dormire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Warren Rusty Collins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dave Dormire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?