Baddoo v. United States of America
Emmanuel Baddoo |
United States of America |
4:2011cv00939 |
September 16, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Kansas City Office |
Jackson |
Ortrie D. Smith |
Agriculture |
05 U.S.C. ยง 0706 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER and OPINION denying 3 motion for stay of administrative action. Signed on 11/02/2011 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Will-Fees, Eva) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Baddoo v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Frances Reddis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Emmanuel Baddoo | |
Represented By: | G. Addam Fera |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.