Robinson v. Ricoh Americas Corporation

Defendant: Ricoh Americas Corporation
Plaintiff: Barbara L. Robinson
Case Number: 4:2013cv00311
Filed: March 28, 2013
Court: Missouri Western District Court
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: Ortrie D. Smith
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 9, 2014 45 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting in part and denying in part 36 motion for summary judgment. Signed on 5/9/14 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Wolfe, Steve)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robinson v. Ricoh Americas Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ricoh Americas Corporation
Represented By: Vanessa Marti Heftman
Represented By: Karen Kessler Cain
Represented By: James A. Burns, Jr.
Represented By: John Polhemus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara L. Robinson
Represented By: Jeffrey M Hensley
Represented By: Clayton Samuel Harper
Represented By: Theodore C Beckett, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.