Speer et al v. Cerner Corporation
Plaintiff: Fred Speer and Mike McGuirk
Defendant: Cerner Corporation
Case Number: 4:2014cv00204
Filed: March 4, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: Howard F. Sachs
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 5
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 242 ORDER denying 189 motion for partial summary judgment; denying 223 motion for leave to file. Signed on 03/17/2017 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Powers, Jo)
September 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 215 ORDER granting 153 plaintiffs' motion to certify class. The attorneys at Davis George Mook LLC (Tracey Flexter George and Brett A. Davis) and Reavey Law LLC (Patrick Gerard Reavey and Kevin C. Koc) are appointed as class counsel. Fred Speer an d Mike McGuirk are appointed class representatives. Plaintiffs' 182 motion to supplement rule 23 reply brief with newly discovered evidence is GRANTED, and plaintiffs' proposed supplemental brief is considered as filed. Signed on 9/27/16 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda)
September 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 214 ORDER denying 103 motion for partial judgment on the pleadings regarding the FWW; granting in part due to the statute of limitations as to the individual claims of Mike McGuirk for violations of the FLSA and MMWL as well as the individual claims o f Fred Speer for violations of the FLSA, and denying in part in all other respects 105 motion for partial summary judgment regarding Wellness Incentive claims; and denying 141 motion for partial summary judgment regarding pay types not paid to plaintiffs. Signed on 09/26/2016 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Powers, Jo)
March 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 165 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 97 motion to certify class. Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for FLSA Conditional Collective Action Certification and Notice and Integrated Suggestions in Support is GRANTED IN PART as it relates to conditional certification of the Late Payment of Overtime and Miscalculated Overtime classes, and DENIED IN PART as related to the Fluctuating Work Week class. Signed on 3/30/16 by District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr. (Enss, Rhonda)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Speer et al v. Cerner Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cerner Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fred Speer
Represented By: Kevin C. Koc
Represented By: Patrick Gerard Reavey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mike McGuirk
Represented By: Kevin C. Koc
Represented By: Patrick Gerard Reavey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?