U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Evans

Plaintiff: U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant: Gregory Christopher Evans
Case Number: 4:2014cv00839
Filed: September 24, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Clay
Presiding Judge: Ortrie D. Smith
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 7:25 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 CONSENT ORDER OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION, CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY, AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF AGAINST GREGORY CHRISTOPHER EVANS. Signed on 6/16/15 by District Judge Ortrie D. Smith. (Matthes, Renea)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Represented By: Rachel Anne Hayes
Represented By: Sophia Siddiqui
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory Christopher Evans
Represented By: Braden M. Perry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?